As the U.S. is actively participating in more military actions at once than since the end of World War II  it is talking big against yet another target. Iran is being targeted once again with threats of military action. Is it time for this tension to finally go hot? If the alleged Iranian terror plot catches the attention of all the countries involved it could be used to justify punishing the Iranian people. The only problem with this is the fact that many people are questioning the authenticity of the terror plot story which has emerged this week. Even the Council On Foreign Relations have published these concerns.
    When The whole story is looked at it also appears to be a possible sting operation performed by the government. The suspect seems to have very little motive to carry out or help in such an attack in such a difficult location as within the U.S. Some have begun to ask the question if this also serves the purpose to cover up or distract from the recent announcement of Congressional subpenas being served to the top brass of the justice department over the Fast and Furious scandal that has been growing. Attorney General himself Eric Holder will be summoned to answer questions about this plot that was formulated to get guns into the hands of Mexican drug cartels from American sources in order to beef up support for stronger gun restrictions in the U.S. As the plot is dug into we are reminded of past experiences of government drug/gun trafficking in the past. Who knows how deep the intentions of such a program could go. When some believe President Obama himself could be dragged into certain implication of planning or lying about this issue it would make sense to have a need to distract from such issues that are growing on our southern border. Judge Napolitano ask these questions here:



Hopefully it is only a need for distractions, but the implications of it being the earlier mentioned desire to finally bring the conflict with Iran to war as the likes of Zigbnew Brezinski in his book The Grand Chessboard and the NeoCons have wanted for a long time now is devastating for America and the world (see Ret. General Wesley Clark speak of the NeoCon plans here). There are rumors coming from military sources of the possibility of an attack being put into motion in the next couple of weeks. 


Too many pieces of the puzzle coming are coming together. Let us hope that rumors of war stay only rumors.

Obama: No options off the table over Iran assassination plot

U.S. President says 'no dispute' Iranian government involved in alleged plot to assassinate Saudi ambassador in Washington.

U.S .President Barack Obama said Thursday there was "no dispute" that Iran was involved in an alleged terrorist plot against the Saudi ambassador in Washington that was uncovered this week.
"We would not be bringing forward a case unless we knew exactly how to support all the all facts contained in the indictment," Obama told a press conference during a visit by South Korean President Lee Myung-bak.
The United States filed charges Tuesday that Iranian agents planned to engage a Mexican drug cartel to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador to the US, Adel A Al-Jubeir, possibly through a bombing at al-Jubeir's favorite Washington restaurant.
The action is part of a "pattern of dangerous and reckless behavior by the Iranian government," Obama said, but declined to specify which officials in Tehran may have known about the plot
Despite the fact that Iran and the U.S. do not have diplomatic ties, State Department Spokeswoman suggested on Thursday that there have been contacts between the two countries. Victoria Nuland said in a press briefing that the U.S. has had "direct contact with Iran." "I'm not going to give you any further details than that," she said, "but just to say that we have direct contact with Iran on this issue."
Obama said he would "take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran," but indicated the United States would continue to pressure Tehran, including pursuing tougher sanctions.
On Wednesday. Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren said that Israel is taking seriously the thwarted plot - and the possibility that the Israeli Embassy was a target - saying it was "definitely an escalation" in an interview with MSNBC.
"We know the Iran regime. This is an Iranian regime that has not only sponsored terrorist organizations in our area, Hamas and Hezbollah, that have fired thousands and thousands of rockets at our civilian population, but they've struck abroad as well," Oren said in the interview.
The Israeli ambassador then went on to recount how Iran was responsible for the bombing of the Israeli Embassy and a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, killing over a hundred people.
" Iranian terrorist organizations have killed hundreds of American servicemen, whether in Saudi Arabia, in Iraq, in Lebanon back then - we always have to be vigilant about the Iranian government," Oren reportedly warned.
He said this was "definitely an escalation", adding that "it's not out of character for the Iranian regime; this is not a rational regime".
When asked whether Israel is going to take action against Iran, Oren told MSNBC "we are always fighting against Iranian terror at our borders and beyond our borders, and we're always vigilant and we have very good partners in the security and law enforcement institutions of the United States."
 

As people become more and more upset with the idea of intrusive searches at the airports the government is seeking to stop the most effective form of criticism and shaming possible. The first amendment is directly under attack like never before if we can not show the obscurity of the TSA through satire. I'd like to see if these standards would be applied to the late night TV the same way as it would be applied to you and I.

House Bill Would Criminalize Satire of TSA

On September 22, 2011, H.R. 3011 was introduced in the House. It is entitled the “Transportation Security Administration Authorization Act of 2011” and it contains some curious language.
Two thirds of the way through the ponderous bill, in Sec. 295, we find the following:

Whoever, except with the written permission of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Security (or the Director of the Federal Air Marshal Service for issues involving the Federal Air Marshal Service), knowingly uses the words ‘Transportation Security Administration’, ‘United States Transportation Security Administration’, ‘Federal Air Marshal Service’, ‘United States Federal Air Marshal Service’, ‘Federal Air Marshals’, the initials ‘T.S.A.’, ‘F.A.M.S.’, ‘F.A.M.’, or any colorable imitation of such words or initials, or the likeness of a Transportation Security Administration or Federal Air Marshal Service badge, logo, or insignia on any item of apparel, in connection with any advertisement, circular, book, pamphlet, software, or other publication, or with any play, motion picture, broadcast, telecast, or other production, in a matter that is reasonably calculated to convey the impression that the wearer of the item of apparel is acting pursuant to the legal authority of the Transportation Security Administration or Federal Air Marshal Service, or to convey the impression that such advertisement, circular, book, pamphlet, software, or other publication, or such play, motion picture, broadcast, telecast, or other production, is approved, endorsed, or authorized by the Transportation Security Administration or Federal Air Marshal Service .(Emphasis added.)

In other words, if you print a t-shirt or produce a publication with a TSA logo, the government may soon be able to arrest and prosecute you.
The language states that it would be illegal to “convey the impression” that you are representing the TSA, but this interpretation would likely be left to federal prosecutors.
In the past, satire was protected under the First Amendment, but it may soon be illegal to poke fun at the TSA or use its logo or even utter its name. Notice there is no exception in the above language for parody.
Political satire is as old as the Greeks and the Bible. But it may now become a punishable crime if this legislation is enacted.
The TSA and the Justice Department are obviously serious about making sure we don’t criticize their Gestapo operation. Since they began irradiating citizens with naked body scanners and shoving their hands down the pants of old ladies and grade school kids, public outrage has reached a crescendo.

In case you have forgotten there is a humanitarian disaster ongoing in Japan. The current and future generations of Japan will be decimated by cancers and reproductive problems. The questions are, will major portions of the islands and surrounding area become uninhabitable once we have to face the truth of it all? Why is no one really talking about his? The future looks bleak there. How will this effect all of us? We need to start talking about this.

Fukushima Radiation Hits Tokyo

CNN reports today:

An extraordinarily high level of radiation was detected in one spot in a central Tokyo residential district Thursday, prompting the local government to cordon off the small area, local officials said.
Radiation levels were higher in Tokyo’s Setagaya ward than in the evacuation area around the badly damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, according to ward Mayor Nobuto Hosaka.
“We are shocked to see such high radiation level was detected in our neighborhood. We cannot leave it as is,” Hosaka told reporters.
But the tsunami-struck Fukushima plant may not be the source of the radiation, Hosaka said later on state television.
Officials searching for the cause found “glass bottles in a cardboard box” in the basement of a house in the neighborhood which sent radiation detectors off the charts, he said on NHK.
“We suspect these bottles in basement could be the cause of the high radiation reading and we are hastily working to confirm it,” he said.
Radiation experts are now checking what contaminated the bottles, a Setagaya ward official told CNN, declining to be named in line with policy.

Perhaps it is just some random contaminated bottles.
But as the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday:

Japanese researchers discovered high levels of radioactive material in concentrated areas in Tokyo and Yokohama, more than 241 kilometers away from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, as increasingly thorough tests provide a clearer picture of just how far contamination has spread and accumulated ….
In Tokyo, a sidewalk in Setagaya ward, in the western part of the city, recorded radiation levels of 2.707 microsieverts per hour, about 50 times higher than another location in Setagaya where the ward regularly monitors radiation levels….
In Yokohama, the local government said last month that it detected 40,200 becquerels of radioactive cesium per kilogram of sediments collected from one part of a roadside ditch….
Yokohama is investigating another spot on an apartment rooftop where tests conducted by a local private research institute detected more than 60,000 becquerels of radioactive cesium per a kilogram of sediments.

The Journal also notes that these radioactive hotspots were not found through routine tests, but only because some residents walked around with geiger counters:

Both Setagaya Ward and Yokohama discovered those concentrated spots after residents carrying their radiation measuring devices noticed such spots and reported it to local officials.

The Australian noted today:

Strontium 90, a highly dangerous radioactive isotope, has reportedly been found atop an apartment building in Yokohama, fuelling fears that fallout from the Fukushima disaster has affected the greater Tokyo area.
Yokohama, a city of 3.6 million people, effectively adjoins the Japanese capital, and sits about 250km from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant. [...]

And ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) reported yesterday:

Elevated levels of radioactive strontium, which can cause cancer, have been found 250 kilometres from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant.
The find in the city of Yokohama has heightened fears that radiation has spread further than the Japanese government has acknowledged.

As I’ve previously noted, Japanese government officials and high-level scientists have considered evacuating Tokyo. I hope and pray that these high readings are not the start of worse to come.
In related news, plutonium was found 28 miles from Fukushima and:

The latest discovery is a potentially disturbing turn, as it shows that people relatively far from the plant could be exposed to more dangerous elements than had been previously disclosed.

The Japanese government’s response? To stop testing for plutonium, and to tell people they shouldn’t use geiger counters to test for themselves.
The Japanese government has been caught blatantly under-reporting radiation levels in general, and Japanese professors are starting to fear for Japan’s future.

source: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/10/tokyo-hit-with-fukushima-radiation.html

Russian men: an endangered species?

“What used to be perceived as infertility is now very different. Twenty years ago, 200 million viable sperm per milliliter was considered normal. Today, 15 million is average,” Margarita Anshina, director of the Center for Reproduction and Genetics, told RT.




For more on the same subject from a more western point of view watch, The Disappearing Male

OWS: Are Mindless Americans Falling Prey to the Collectivist Trap?

A disturbing new trend has quietly taken hold over simultaneous nationwide protests in the United States over the last few weeks.

“The People’s Microphone” was used during union protests in Wisconsin.

Visible throughout the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) protests, is a technique dubbed as  “The People’s Microphone”. It has been deployed nationwide, and is becoming the dominant vehicle for group interaction and communication. So what is it?
According to the official OWS wiki page :
“New York City requires a permit to use “amplified sound.” Since Occupy Wall Street does not have a permit, police have interpreted that to mean even the use of an electric bullhorn. As a response to such limitations, a phenomenon known as the “People’s Microphone” has evolved, where a person making a speech pauses while the nearby members of the audience repeats the previous phrase (somewhat) in unison.” The entry adds, “The (People’s Microphone) effect has been called “comic or exhilarating – often all at once.” Some feel this provided a further unifying effect for the crowd.”
Advocates of this new method claim that it is a work-around to restrictive city ordinances, and serves as a ‘progressive communication’ tool which allows groups to speak and achieve “community consensus”, and that the audience is asked to listen in a whole new way and to actually help transmit the message to others. They will tell you that accuracy and transparency are the crucial elements to the People’s Microphone.

NLP device: ‘call-and-return’
Crowd participants slowly repeat each phrase the leading speaker is saying to them, with a series of hand signs used to provide the speaker and the group with feedback.
To the casual observer, this new system of communication may appear as compelling, as it is metaphoric. It might also remind you of the infamous ‘pass the conch’ scene from the  Nobel Prize-winning novel by William Golding, Lord of the Flies. 

It is a very slow and tedious process, often resulting in very few actual issues being fleshed out. In most cases, it takes triple the amount of time to convey the same amount of information that a normal speaker would accomplish by talking directly to the audience. But this can only be done when the group is forced to repeat the words of the speaker, so the speaker is forced to talk slowly, using fewer words at once. In this way, it is also a mesmerizing and extremely hypnotic group communication tool.
In this way, such NLP methods can also be used to promote ‘group-think’ and could be described as collectivist mind control education at its very finest.
Successful NLP systems like this are commonly used by sales people in business, as well as in advertising and of course politics, working in restricted bloc of words, and often with restricted vocabularies.
Group moderators insist that this is done so that ‘everybody is safe’, and that the group is ‘doing things properly’. Any interaction with a speaker can only be done by employing a series of parochial child-like hand-signs, normally reserved for children attending school in K-8 grades.
There is certain appeal to ‘being part of the community’, where group leaders will ask the crowd for a ‘temperature check’ in order to determine “how ‘the bloc’ feels about what someone has said”, and if what someone is in consensus with “the bloc”. The audience will offer up a hand signal of waiving both hands to show their approval.
Once a consensus is identified, it’s typical that members of “the bloc” will feel that they are part of the collective, and thus, “part of the change”.
Unfortunately, in this type of system most of the group have little idea of what they are actually repeating, or who and what they are supporting with their hand signals, waving their hands, or making a triangle sign to communicate.
Watch as the speaker in the following video explains to his ‘bloc’  the collective will be banning any applause, because the clapping of hands might drown out someone within the collective who is trying to be heard. See this unfold in the bizarre Occupy Atlanta video below:


In the end, Occupy Atlanta organizers and the group became so enthralled with their people’s Microphone that Congressman and civil rights hero John Lewis was not allowed an opportunity to speak to ‘the bloc’. The ‘process’ eventually sent the Congressman packing.
The NLP ‘call-and-repeat’ mechanism can no doubt be used to hypnotic effect. Often these type of techniques are used in order to filter out the free thinkers, intense self-policing at its most stringent. Notice that when group members are disagreeing, their hands are much lower, but at their maximum when ‘the bloc’ seems to all be in agreement.
What these protestors are hardly aware of, is that they may be participating a form of modern day group-think. It is a form of social control whereby everyone in the group believes that they must all agree and must all be of the same mind. Armed with this power new tool, consensus promoters can be bussed into sites around the country, training groups to chant key group-think talking points using mnemonic phrases.
The collectivist trap
Participants truly believe in the process and that the process is very ‘democratic’, civilized, radical, effective, and thus, revolutionary. But few within these groups are actually aware of the NLP concepts they have opted into, nor are they familiar with tried and tested mind control methods, nor the powerful political tool of collectivism. So it is not surprising that most will enthusiastically join in the group and religiously abide by its laws of conversation, following some scripted agenda instead of being spontaneous or truly radical.
The People’s Microphone can also lead a group to believe by these hand signal votes they can create a law and enforce it. This can often result in an oxymoronic “totalitarian-consensus”, where a perceived consensus occurs, but in reality, a consensus was only reach because each member of the group was afraid to be ejected from the collective. Other video examples include Occupy Amherst, Occupy Tampa, and Occupy DC filmed by Adam Kokesh. All three can be viewed below:




This form of mob mentality can be dangerous because the leader of a group is leading their flock towards his or her direction of choice, but still offering them the illusion it is ‘what everyone in the community wants’. In the classic film Dr Zhivago, scenes appear in which leading “intellectual” group-thinkers demolish the private property of others because, according to the collective, “they don’t deserve to own it”.
Taking  this concept is taken to its extreme form, a mob or individual within the mob  could intimidate or even physically assault a person, while the mob believe they are just watching what the collective, or ‘community’ wants to happen.
Hardly grass roots
It is already well documented that the original Occupy Wall Street protest was seeded by a collectivist George Soros funded foundation called Ad Busters, and allegedly supported by the shadowy agitator hacker group called Anonymous.

For the last decade, globalist foundations promoting democracy and freedom have been active in fomenting uprisings all over the planet, and fresh off their international successes  they have finally come home to roost within the OWS movement.
But what is not as well documented is the involvement of the international CIA front organization called the Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies (CANVAS). This can be described as a kind of consultancy for would-be revolutionaries, an organization of professional agitators-for-hire who globe-trot, openly promoting their CFR-sponsored agenda- most notably in Egypt, where CANVAS trained and managed Egyptian protestors as early as 2009 in preparation for the fabled ‘Arab Spring’ in 2010-2011.
Their projects are clandestine, kept secret while in preparation, names of clients are not publically available, are well funded by American intelligence services. Yes, they are now active on US soil.
It is important that readers understand how CANVAS was created from the Serbian political youth movement called OPTOR!(translated as ‘Resistance!), who’s initial project was the overthrow of the Slobodan Milosevic government in Yugoslavia in 2000.

OPTOR’s support and funding network  reads like a who’s who of CIA and globalist front foundations, including well known CIA front organization USAID, George Soros’s collectivist front foundation Freedom House, and the National Endowment for Democracy whose operational successes include the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, and the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, each heavily financed and backed by groups funded by or connected to the U.S. government. Likewise, events in Tunisia, North Africa and Egypt were orchestrated out of the finest detail, and it seems that events surrounding the OWS movement are no different.

Key operatives in OPTOR!, and later for CANVAS are Serbians  Ivan Marovic and Srdja Popovic. After the fall of Milosovec, the western media hailed Marovic as a democratic genius, but it came out his entire program came out of an elite Boston think tank’s ‘regime change’ manual, From Dictatorship to Democracy, written by a Harvard Professor Gene Sharp.
From the first days of OWS, it should be noted that Marovic was already on site, and guiding groups by demonstrating the power of The People’s Microphone. Watch here as Marovic himself leads crowds in the first days of the protests:

Some of the CANVAS professionally developed, ‘subversive’ revolutionary methods are outlined in the incredible documentary film The Revolution Business, where paid facilitators are employed to train protesters, acting as a guide through the process which also includes communication techniques and the circulation of media talking points.
Mind control and the dumbing-down of America

“The aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment at all; it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed a standard citizenry, to put down dissent and originality” – H. L. Mencken
These NLP techniques have taken hold so quickly in across OWS are the very techniques that have already been implemented throughout the nation’s public education systems, and are also present in popular children’s programming.
Typically, participants in a mind control exercise engage in group-think, not unlike the participants shown in these videos. Members of the group will also get an endorphin rush similar to what one might receive during an evangelical church performance, or even at hip-hop concert, where the MC shouts, “now wave your hands in the air, and wave ‘em like you just don’t care.”
Charlotte Iserbyt  was a Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, where she blew the whistle on a major technology initiative which would control curriculum in America’s classrooms shown in the documentary film, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America.  Most Americans participating in the OWS have come through the state education system, whose chief objective, according to Charlotte Iserbyt, is teaching groups, and thus individuals- to be obedient.
The dominant message which is now coming out of the OWS protests across the US appears to be  the collectivist idea of an unequal distribution of wealth in the United States, and this can only be described as social engineer’s blueprint for a 21^st century Bolshevik Revolution in America, and it is playing out right before our eyes as the millions of young, disaffected Americans search for simple collectivist answers to society’s many ills.

One can certainly argue here, that the dumbing-down of America would serve such an agenda.
Establishing fear in a police state 
Notice that we already have “free speech zones” in the US, while prospective protesters in the UK must apply with the city police for a license to demonstrate.
Aside from the incessant need by most young Americans to be led by a lone, some singular voice, the underlying social engineering tool which has enabled the intellectual and sovereign castration of Americans, is quite simply… the fear of being arrested.
One singular thing that a decade of free speech zones, homeland security, surveillance and a comprehensive dismantling of the Bill of Rights(equally under both Bush and Obama) has achieved – is just that – a constant fear of a shadowy police state. Without this underlying fear, the repressive Soviet-style group-think scenes we see in these video could never have been possible.
The whole existence of the People’s Microphone is down to the fact that NYC police have imposed draconian measures like banning megaphones. As far as requiring a license to protest in public, not using a PA system in public, or restricting filming in a public space, true patriots and believers in a free society should not seek ‘permits’ for anything, nor should they respect ‘prohibitions’ on a citizen’s right to free speech and assembly.
Notice that not all cities in the USA prohibit bull-horning or amplified speakers, yet, American activists have still voluntarily defaulted back to collectivist NLP method, People’s Microphone, initially unveiled at OWS in NYC.

More than anything, these videos of mindless call-and-repeat chanting show the deep problems any true freedom movement must overcome in reaching ‘the 99%’ in America.
Where it’s heading
From its onset, many writers and pundits within the independent media and freedom movement threw their support behind OWS, with the sincere hope it focused on the deeper, fundamental globalist issues- like restoring the Constitution, the need for smaller government, the creation and counterfeiting our currency through the Federal Reserve System, causing the inflationary boom and bust cycles that have been periodically culling the world’s upwardly mobile working and middle classes. Instead, the focus of both protesters and media has drifted towards system actors like CEO’s, bankers and politicians, rather than address the very system itself.
If you take into account the level by which the Occupy Wall Street movement has already been co-opted by the ‘progressives’ and the Democratic Party, and endorsed whole-heartedly by staunch globalists within the US power-structure like Ben Bernanke, President Obama and Nancy Pelosi, this writer believes strongly that OWS will likely morph into a permanent left wing counter-weight to the now Republican co-opted Tea Party movement.
The movement may have grown organically, but as we saw with Ron Paul’s initial Tea Party spark in 2007, once a movement’s political gravity reached a certain stage, the establishment quickly deploys its professional agitators, political operatives and mainstream media gate keepers in order to control its motion and shepherd its evolution. Already, the mainstream media have injected the talking point which most Americans are already parroting, that is: “America’s Occupy Movement is the Democrats’ equivalent to the Tea Party”.
What these movements do is function as an easy access, pressure-release valve for the controlled Left and Right wings. Both parties in the US have become too rigid, offering little to a 21^st century society that is now information-rich, but still insight poor, and generally cater to the lowest common social denominator. With unemployment and debts high, and opportunities sparse, the simplified message of collectivism championed by celebrities like Michael Moore will certain hold an attractive appeal to many Americans who are unfamiliar with its well documented past horrors.

Soon, the Occupy London movement will begin in the UK. Based on recent trends in the US, this writer will also strongly predict that OWS’s British counterpart will quickly morph into anti-Tory government, pro-socialist, climate change/green movement, not least because the majority of protesters in the UK will be among the ranks of the unemployed, indebted students, and chronic state benefit recipients- a fact which almost guarantees their loyal support of the UK’s social entitlement control-grid, as well as memberships to the collectivist EU and UN supra-national organizations.
In times of economic strife, populations are easily lured into a simple, ideological trap like collectivism. Most participants in the OWS movement would be completely unaware of who is directing, steering their new ‘grassroots’ conversation.
To avoid the collectivist trap, participants in OWS events all across the US must first learn to read between the lines, or they may unwittingly become party to something completely different to what they thought they had signed up for in the first place.

Just so you know, The Federal Reserve is a private institution which our government has empowered. The heart of the problem is not Wall Street exactly. It is where all the top names in banking push their agenda through, and that is behind the closed doors of the Federal Reserve. The bankers of the world are hiding behind the world's central banks. The rich are not really the problem, it is the inner workings of these banks. Expose the shareholders of the Federal Reserve!!

Zombie training? OWS Atlanta turns into collective hypnosis 'one voice' weirdness

(NaturalNews) Occupy Wall Street protesters are undergoing collectivist zombie training in Atlanta, where a large group was caught on film engaging in a weird sort of "one voice" hypnotic chanting ritual that characterizes the key principles of both Communism and Socialism. Watch the video at:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=8B371...

Having an extensive background in studying linguistics and human psychology, I recognize mass hypnosis when I see it. The mind-numbing call-and-return vocalizations captured in this video reflect the same kind of mind control techniques used in cults, sporting events and even some church revival events. The whole point of this experience is to eliminate the individual mind and train everyone to think, and say, and do exactly what they are told to do by a "leaderless leader" who is really a mind control manipulator.

Bending the will of the masses

Watch this video. What you're seeing is classic mind control, shrouded in the context of a public protest. And yet these people are practicing the very same thing they claim to be protesting! What is that? The centralization of power in America.

That's the whole problem with Wall Street, and Congress, and the mega corporations -- they all concentrate power in the hands of the few while everyone else just follows along and does what they're told. This is a perfectly reflection of this hypnosis "zombie training" ritual at which one person holding the loudspeaker utters one verbal command after another as each one is repeated en masse by the crowd of clueless followers. That's much like the relationship between the Federal Reserve and U.S. bank account holders.

Free-thinking individuals do not engage in this kind of behavior! If I had witnessed this in person, I would have shouted out, "You are all zombies!" at which point I'm sure I would probably need my zombie defender flamethrower to roast the mindless masses as they tried to swarm over me with their "one mind" attack.

Watch this video and see for yourself. This is some really weird collectivist mind control stuff that should make you absolutely shudder:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=8B371...

Now, I don't have anything against a group of peaceful meditators who want to sit in a drum circle somewhere and pray for world peace. I've been part of plenty of that myself, and it's a valuable exercise in positive intention. But when it comes down to restructuring society, you've got to engage the individual creative minds of intelligent men and woman who can debate ideas from a position of individual sovereignty, not some sort of collective hive mind engaging in weird zombie chants.

A brief transcript of the Atlanta zombie protesters

Here's a taste of how the hypnotic trance ritual unfolded in Atlanta. Keep in mind the "leader" is on a loudspeaker so that his voice drowns out everyone else's, even though he claims that everyone should be equally heard...

Leader: We have someone here...

Zombies: We have someone here...

Leader: Who would like to address the assembly.

Zombies: Who would like to address the assembly.

Leader: That person...

Zombies: That person...

Leader: is Congressman...

Zombies: is Congressman...

Leader: John Lewis.

Zombies: John Lewis.

At this point, the crowd erupts into spontaneous applause for Rep. John Lewis. But the zombie leader feels this spontaneous action on the part of the crowd is some sort of violation of the groupthink, so he proceeds to instruct people that they should feel bad about applauding, because the sound of their applause might have been so loud that someone who was trying to speak could not be hard. (Bizarre zombie logic? Because this zombie leader is blaring his voice over a loudspeaker...)

Leader: How do we feel...

Zombies: How do we feel...

Leader: with hand signs please.

Zombies: with hand signs please.

Leader: Let me take a moment...

Zombies: Let me take a moment...

Leader: to explain why...

Zombies: to explain why...

Leader: we use hand signs.

Zombies: we use hand signs.

Leader: Clapping...

Zombies: Clapping...

Leader: can prevent someone else...

Zombies: can prevent someone else...

Leader: who is addressing the assembly...

Zombies: who is addressing the assembly...

Leader: from being heard.

Zombies: from being heard.

Leader: We want everyone's voice...

Zombies: We want everyone's voice...

Leader: to be heard.

Zombies: to be heard.

Leader: To signal approval...

Zombies: To signal approval...

Leader: wave your hands or your fingers...

Zombies: wave your hands or your fingers...

Leader: or do a thumbs up.

Zombies: or do a thumbs up.

Leader: That way...

Zombies: That way...

Leader: We can hear each other.

Zombies: We can hear each other.

At one point, a female audience member is allows to stand and explain her own weird "we are all the same" philosophy of why the group should allow Rep. John Lewis to speak:

Woman: Allowing Senator Lewis to speak... (she thinks he's a Senator, apparently)

Zombies: Allowing Senator Lewis to speak...

Woman: does not make him a better human being.

Zombies: does not make him a better human being.

Woman: it just says...

Zombies: it just says...

Woman: that we respect the work he's done...

Zombies: that we respect the work he's done...

Woman: and we respect the position he holds...

Zombies: and we respect the position he holds...

Woman: in the government we want to change.

Zombies: in the government we want to change.

Woman: People like John Lewis...

Zombies: People like John Lewis...

Woman: has just as much right...

Zombies: has just as much right...

Woman: to be part of the change...

Zombies: to be part of the change...

Woman: as to be part of the problem.

Zombies: as to be part of the problem.

After this woman finishes speaking, large numbers of other people in the zombie crowd raise their hands as if they want to speak. They are waving their arms and hands like a bunch of kindergarteners who are asking for permission to go to the bathroom.

Seriously, these are a bunch of adults acting with an elementary school mentality combined with a weird hypnotic role playing trance where they all believe they are contributing to a collective hive of some sort.

Ultimately, after what seems like endless rounds of ridiculous vocalizing about whether Rep. John Lewis should be "allowed" to speak or not, they diss the man and "decide" that he shouldn't speak at all!

So this man, who was already voted into office as a representative of the People, is not allowed to address the People? Even when the zombie leader on the loudspeaker says "everyone" should be heard?

I mean, hey, I probably disagree with Rep. John Lewis on just about everything he says, but I still support his right to speak in public as a representative of the people who elected him! Who are these brain-numbed zombie masses to prevent a member of Congress from saying a few words?

Why collectivism is so dangerous

Watching all this gives me the willies! This is a prime example of "the madness of crowds" and the dangerous collectivist mindset that deludes these people into thinking whatever they do is for "the common good." Total Marxism is alive and well in Atlanta, it seems, and it's led by a bunch of do-gooder trance-inducers who somehow manage to attract a group of willing followers who just can't wait to be told what to say and think. They're even commanded to use hand signs instead of applause.

These are the kind of people who destroy societies. Well, them and the criminal banksters who run Wall Street, too. On that point, the zombies are right that the banksters are crooks. But you don't solve these problems by replacing one delusion with another. The only path to true freedom is found in protecting individual liberty which necessarily involves protecting the individual right to speak your mind without seeking permission from some kind of weird collectivist groupthink.

The whole point of free individuals having both their First Amendment and Second Amendment rights is that each person is their own sovereign citizen who has the right, and the power, to exercise freedom, protect the innocent, seek justice and stand as a bastion of strength and individual liberty against a sea of conformist, brainwashed masses whether they be tyrannical governments or mind-numbed zombies.

The whole point of having a Second Amendment, of course, is so that we can protect ourselves from zombies and tyrants who attempt to overrun nations with disturbing regularity. The Second Amendment is what protects the First Amendment, because if the People didn't have the ability to shoot back, they would very quickly lose their right to speak out.

It's not the collapse that you should worry about; it's the rebuilding of society that comes after

All this reminds me to remind you that once the collapse of America is in full swing, NaturalNews will put out a call for patriots and lovers of liberty to take action and interject yourself into the discussions of how we rebuild society.

The danger -- the great danger in all this -- is that after the collapse of our current system, the collectivist zombies will take control and we will end up with something far, far worse than the crony capitalism we have today. If you thought George Bush and his secret prisons were bad, just imagine Nancy Pelosi leading a national zombie chant, declaring that anyone earning over $125,000 a year should have their wealth confiscated; that Free Speech is now subject to government approval; that everyone except the government should be completely disarmed; and that individual liberty must be sacrificed for the "common good of the People." These are all code words for outright government tyranny.

Remember: Just because our current system is headed for collapse doesn't mean we're automatically going to get something better in its place. If we want a truly free and just society, we will have to fight for it. We will need the Jeffersonians, the Ron Paul supporters, the liberty lovers and the freedom fighters to take decisive action in making sure our "Next Society" doesn't end up becoming some sort of weird collectivist cult led by people like Michael Moore.

Just because the People are pissed off doesn't mean they understand the principles of liberty and economic growth. Many protesters, remember, actually believe that governments create jobs! (Hilarious.) And that everybody can just be given free health care, free educations, free rent, and free everything under a nanny state system where the government controls everything they do.

While I agree that education should be provided by one generation for the benefit of the next (in other words, all education is free when you're young, but you pay it forward to the next generation), I also understand that the key to economic growth is reducing government burdens on small businesses -- especially in the realm of health care. We've got to get government out of the way and let America's great entrepreneurs create jobs and create wealth. That only happens when liberty is assured; when power is decentralized; and when regulatory burdens are minimized to cover only the really important things like preventing corporations from dumping toxic chemicals into the rivers and so on.

Most ideas about how to run society are BAD ideas

People have all sorts of weird ideas about how to run societies, but history has shown us that most of them are ill-conceived. Furthermore, tyranny always comes out of good intentions, so it's not enough to just "intend" to create a utopian society. It comes down to HOW you structure it.

What Jefferson and America's founding fathers understood is that all power tends to become concentrated over time in the hands of the few. Thus, the Declaration of Independence -- and later the Bill of Rights -- were all written to decentralize power by placing it in the hands of sovereign citizens from which government was granted its power to protect the rights of the People. The power of government stems solely from the power of the People who conditionally grant such power to the government. This is the polar opposite of what collectivists believe: They think that power begins with a central authority and then it is distributed to the obedient masses from there. That's why so many OWS protesters are still calling for big government to solve all their problems... they still believe government rules over them and therefore has the authority to fix everything!

Watch my increasingly popular video "Freetopia" to get a better understanding of all this:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=16899...

Beware of collectivism

Only through the interaction of individual thought -- brought forth by free men and women -- can we truly achieve a brighter future. Those who try to sell you (or hypnotize you) to believe in socialism, communism, Marxism or other "groupthink" solutions are terribly misled and have failed to read (or understand) history. Liberty is the only path to lasting freedom and economic abundance.

End the Fed! Bring the money supply back to the People:
http://endthefedusa.ning.com/

Support States' rights! The Tenth Amendment helps halt the federal takeover of local laws:
http://www.TenthAmendmentCenter.com

Support Ron Paul! He's the only candidate who understands freedom and is willing to protect it:
http://www.RonPaul2012.com

Join the protests! Let your voice be heard as a pro-freedom, pro-Ron Paul liberty defender who believes in food freedom (raw milk), farm freedom (hemp farming), medical freedom (medicinal herbs), economic freedom (honest money) and individual freedom (Bill of Rights). Carry the signs, shoot videos and upload them to NaturalNews.TV if you wish.

This is how we achieve real, lasting change -- by starting with just showing up and making sure the protests aren't dominated by a bunch of collectivist zombies who utterly fail to understand what freedom really means.

Repeat after me: Freedom is...

You: Freedom is...

Me: ...when you don't do...

You: ...when you don't do...

Me: ...what somebody tells you to do...

You: ...what somebody tells you to do...

Me: ...just because they claim false authority over you.

You: ...just because they claim false authority over you.

There, doesn't that feel better? Think for yourself! And beware of zombies.

     Here is an article informing us of a project to identify the resistance that will be met against further identity management technologies such as implantable chips and mobile face or iris recognition technology. These studies will seek to find techniques around the resistance to such technology. If we truly lived in a free society, should the government be allowed to use our money to find ways to undermine our feelings about such invasive technologies? This will bring us closer to a Minority Report type world, and we should be able to say no to such a world. 

    This is only one example of the government studying techniques that help introduce idea or technologies into society for their benefit. We are in a propaganda soaked society from commercial, but especially government sources.

Managing identity

Researchers from Northumbria University are among a team of academics sharing in a £1.36million grant to examine future technologies of identity management.  Professor Pam Briggs, Dean of the School of Life Sciences at Northumbria, will be involved in the  three-year IMPRINTS project which will be led by Professor Liesbet van Zoonen of Loughborough University, alongside colleagues from Dundee and Essex.
The project is funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). An additional grant has been awarded by the Department of Homeland Security in America to the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to simultaneously conduct the study in the US.
The Identity Management: Public Responses to Identity Technologies and Services (IMPRINTS) project aims to assess how and why the UK and US public will engage with particular future practices, services and technologies of identity management, while resisting others.
Iris and full-body scans and face or voice recognition have already become well-known practices, but innovations like implantable chips, odour scans, online ‘object’ passwords and mobile identity-sharing are on the horizon. It is unclear whether and why members of the public will embrace these innovations or reject them.
The Northumbria aspect of the project will involve sourcing futuristic scenarios from science fiction and academic literature and then developing stimuli to use with focus groups to trigger thinking around identity management.  
Professor Briggs said: “I’ll be working with focus groups drawn from different populations, including young people, older adults and refugees, to talk to them about what ‘identity management’ means to them and we’ll be looking at inter-generational differences in what is acceptable and unacceptable in the ‘big brother’ world.
“The aim of the study is to develop a clear sense of the identity ‘taboos and desires’ and work with industry and government to use the ‘desire’ space for development.”
Professor Van Zoonen, Chair of Media and Communications at Loughborough, who is leading the project, added: “'There is a peculiar paradox between the eager sharing of personal details on social network sites, and the deep anxieties about, for instance, biometric identification or a national identity card.
“In this project we aim to gain a better understanding of such anxieties and appetites, and understand the way citizens will respond to new identity management technologies, services and practices in order to promote trustworthy and pleasurable processes of identity verification.”
To achieve this understanding, the researchers will work with stakeholders from civil society and government, security and commercial sectors in both the UK and US.
The project brings together experts in design, computer science, political science, media, psychology, sociology, and risk management, and findings will inform future government and security policy on identity management and its implementation, as well as provide resources for further research.
http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/browse/ne/uninews/2128299

BPA is an estrogen mimicking chemical that is found in certain types of plastics that is used in our everyday modern life. Anything that mimics the effects of human hormones can have numerous negative effects on both sexes of any species, the least of which is cancer causing properties. The effects include effects on the development and workings of all human systems that are effected by the reproductive system.

BPA levels in humans far higher than previously thought

(NaturalNews)
New studies reveal that levels of BPA are massively higher in humans than previously assumed, causing major concern for what has been downplayed by the packaging industry as a false alarm.
BPA, or Bisphenol-A, leaches into food from plastic packaging and from the linings of canned foods, causing cancerous tumors and developmental disorders, including learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, and deformations of sexual organs, especially in newborns.
The CDC estimates that over 90% of people in the U.S. are chronically exposed to BPA at over 3000 times the daily level that the FDA reports. Maybe this monstrous difference comes from the fact that the FDA standards ignored more than 100 credible research experiments and studies other than their own. The new FDA regulatory language offers to seek “further public comment and external input on the science surrounding BPA,” but industry lobbyists argue about “safe levels” and do their best to muddy those waters in order to keep the profits margins maximized.
Much of the latest research and testing of chemicals in foods is being conducted by the very companies that sell them, or by independent labs hired and well paid to conclude that there is “insufficient evidence of levels harmful to humans.” The FDA and the CDC use the rationale that what kills rats in labs may not have the same effect on humans, but this time, hundreds of tests done on humans reveal otherwise.
The BPA label is either on the side or bottom of bottles in black or clear numbers, usually inside of the recycling sign formed by circular arrows. The number 2 means your food is contaminated by aluminum and polyethylene plastic, and the number 7 means there is BPA in your polycarbonate container.
To make things worse, if the bottles or cans have been sitting on the shelf at the grocery for months, the toxic levels of BPA are higher, and since there’s no “born-on date,” like beer might have, there’s no telling the age of the container. Also, if the plastic gets heated up, like in a car, more toxins are released into the drink. Plus, canned goods are sterilized at up to 265% Fahrenheit, so the level of BPA released in those foods is horrendous, not to mention the fact that all of the nutrients at that temperature have been depleted from the source. Metal cans have no warning or indicator whatsoever about BPA.
The remedy is to simply buy glass only and not have to worry about BPA, but then don’t forget to check for sodium benzoate, BHA, BHT, EDTA, and the other “preservative” criminals.
BPA was originally developed in the 1930′s as a synthetic version of the female hormone estrogen. BPA is an endocrine disrupter, meaning it is a chemical that interferes with the hormone system in animals, including humans. Wondering why kids are more hyperactive these days and the doctors suggest prescribing ADHD pharmaceuticals? Bisphenol-A mimics estrogenic activity and enhances mesolimbic dopamine activity, which results in hyperactivity and attention deficits. Still have canned sodas on your grocery list?
Ordered up by the USA at 8 billion pounds per year, BPA is one of the highest volume chemicals produced by mankind, having adverse effects in mammals and invertebrates all over the world. Canned goods sell particularly well in times of recession and financial stress. In February of 2009, the United States saw an 11.5% rise in canned food sales alone. The highest concentrations recorded are in chicken soup, infant formula and ravioli. By the way, it’s also in your dental fillings.
The EPA has not even evaluated BPA for possible carcinogenic activity, and food packaging executives and lobbyists are still planning to use a pregnant woman in their advertising in order to reassure Americans that BPA is safe for children. Remember, an advertisement’s slogan is often a cover up for the product’s greatest weakness.
Sources for this article include:
http://environment.about.com/od/bis…
http://environment.about.com/b/2009…
http://environment.about.com/od/hea…
http://environment.about.com/b/2009…
http://environment.about.com/b/2009…
http://greenliving.about.com/od/hea…
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art…
http://www.ewg.org/bisphenol-a-info…
http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/B…
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Publi…

Here is a little documentary on why you have to question the intentions of revolutionary movements such as the ones happening all over the world right now.